Over the past month in class we've been talking basically about how Americans are fat and grow food the wrong way. Well I am one of those Americans, not necessarily fat, but I eat unhealthy the majority of the time. I thought for my final project I'd choose the experimental option, which would be changing something about the way you eat, whether it be where the food is coming from, how it's prepared, or your diet completely. As I said earlier, I eat generally unhealthy foods. So for my original experiment I was going to eat fast food every meal one day, and record how I feel afterwards, then eat only healthy, organic foods one day and record how I feel. But then I changed my mind because that would be too pricey. I finally decided to change my diet completely. By not eating for 24 hours.
This relates to our class because it involves two main concepts in the unit. The diet of Americans, and the way we view our food. The book I read in class was Omnivores Dilemma, By Michael Pollan, and it discussed that because humans are omnivore's we have the problem of deciding what to eat. We have such a big selection of food we don't know what to eat. Every morning you can hear the same question over and over. "What are we eating for lunch?" Like panda's just know to eat bamboo, cows know to eat grass, but we don't know what to eat. So what happens when you have nothing to eat? That's not part of the omnivores dilemma, because were always supposed to have something to eat. Which is why this experiment opens up a new view, how do humans manage while they don't have anything to eat?
The experiment was from 7:00 p.m. Wednesday night to 7:00 p.m. Thursday night. No food, and the only thing I could drink was water. I didn't think it was going to be exceptionally hard considering I've known people that have fasted the same way for around 24 hours. And for the first 12 or so hours wasn't that bad, probably because I was asleep for most of it. But as the day progressed and I was around other people that were doing the same experiment, it got worst. At first, around 11 a.m. or so, I started to feel really hungry. But thats not horrible, but as time went by things started to get harder, with the urge to eat growing by the minute (or at least it felt that way) and by lunch time (which is around 1 at my internship) I was not feeling good. I wasn't able to get any work done, I was tired, and just uncomfortable. By 3 p.m., I was falling asleep. As soon as I got home from internship around 4 I went straight to sleep, waking up after 7, when I could eat again.
This experience wasn't a good one, but I learned a lot from it. First off, I learned do to do it by yourself because being around other fasters' makes me more hungry. I wouldn't do it again because it wasn't pleasant on any level. I learned that without any food at all, healthy or unhealthy, you can't function correctly. I'll try not to miss any more meals because it isn't healthy, it's like brushing your teeth, you can live missing brushing your teeth a couple of times,but if you keep doing it you're going to get a cavity (and a nasty mouth). So eating fast food three times a day is not healthy by any means, but if you haven't eaten and that's like your only choice, go for it. To answer my question I posed earlier, "how do humans manage when they don't have anything to eat?" The real simple answer is, they don't. They forget their dilemma and turn into rats, eating whatever they can to survive. Which is basically what happens to some people in poverty. They can't afford healthy foods, so it's either fast food or starve. Its a sad, but true reality to many. Which made me realize how like many Americans, I take food for granted. I don't consider it sacred because it's always there. The truth is I can't survive for more then a day without it. And a lot of people don't realize this because they always have food. When the truth is, they would probably suffer more then me. So for now on I will view my food as a little more special, as should other people.
Sunday, October 31, 2010
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Homework 12- Paper Outline
Thesis:
The dominant social practices of our society are industrial atrocities, and will not change because we have adapted our practices so well to our industrial needs.
Major Claim:
The way the U.S food system has developed, it allows the industrial atrocities to rein supreme, due to the government backing and the cheap availability of the industrial food.
Supporting Claim 1:
The government backs the unhealthy industrial atrocities
Evidence 1: They subsidize corn, which is grown in a manner that is not good for the earth
Evidence 2: The government is filled with former food industry members
Evidence 3: They wont pass laws to make food safer, due to the fact it would be taking away from the industry
Supporting Claim 2:
The industrial grown food is much more accessible and cheap then organics and other types of non-industrialized foods.
Evidence 1- Fast food places having cheap menus and "value menus"
(Just as a side note I find it funny how mcdonalds doesn't come up when you type "fast food menus" into google)
Evidence 2: Organic Pricing being higher then that of industrial foods
Evidence 3: Organic statistics vs. fast food
Works cited:
The dominant social practices of our society are industrial atrocities, and will not change because we have adapted our practices so well to our industrial needs.
Major Claim:
The way the U.S food system has developed, it allows the industrial atrocities to rein supreme, due to the government backing and the cheap availability of the industrial food.
Supporting Claim 1:
The government backs the unhealthy industrial atrocities
Evidence 1: They subsidize corn, which is grown in a manner that is not good for the earth
Evidence 2: The government is filled with former food industry members
Evidence 3: They wont pass laws to make food safer, due to the fact it would be taking away from the industry
Supporting Claim 2:
The industrial grown food is much more accessible and cheap then organics and other types of non-industrialized foods.
Evidence 1- Fast food places having cheap menus and "value menus"
(Just as a side note I find it funny how mcdonalds doesn't come up when you type "fast food menus" into google)
Evidence 2: Organic Pricing being higher then that of industrial foods
Evidence 3: Organic statistics vs. fast food
Works cited:
Friday, October 22, 2010
Homework 10- Food Inc. Response
Precis-
The American food system has changed over the past fifty years. It has become more industrialized, more "efficient", and more relint on corn. At the same time, our food system has become more mechanized, dangerous, and unhealthy. Since these changes occurred, the rate of diabetes has increased sharply, as anyone that was born after 2000 has a one in three chance in developing them. Our system has also become more dangerous, with more foodborne illness outbreaks in the past 30 years, then in any other period of that time. Something needs to change in this industrial system, and it's going to need a government reform, yet that may never happen because the food industry lobbys for a lot of major politicians.
Film Vs. Book-
Both the movie, Food Inc., and the book, Omnivores Dilemma cover similar ideas. The way they go about showing these ideas is different. That was evident in the parts where the movie and book discussed industrial organic foods. The movie was more for the industrial organic, explaining how the earth isn't getting poisoned by pesticides. The film was showing people who were saying, "the bigger, the better" when it comes to organics.Two other things that indicate the approval of these farming techniques were that this section was accompanied by upbeat music, and they didn't show these organic factories. In the book Omnivores Dilemma, by Michael Pollan, the book covers the same idea, just was opposed. He went to one of the organic factories, and realized that the way they grow food isn't much better then the regular industrial farms and factories. One reoccurring difference between the book and movie was that, Michael Pollan's book let the other side explain themselves, while the movie just gave short clips of people supporting the other side (industry), without any elaboration.
Thoughts-
Throughout the movie, I realized how ridiculous we've become when it comes to food. For the most part we sacrificed all our quality for quantity. Our food workers are not workers, they're robots. Our food isn't really safe to eat, and there's nothing we can do about it, because the USDA, the people who are supposed to be protecting us, have no power. Are animals are treated like waste, and they're always covered in their own. The emotion I feel about this, anger.
Monday, October 18, 2010
Homework 7D- Omnivore's Dilemma
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 17-
Summary-
People are starting to change to a vegetarian lifestyle now more then ever. Even though we have been eating animals for tens of thousands of years, people are all of a sudden concerned with how ethical killing animals is. Philosophers like Peter Singer bring up the point, all people aren't actually created equal. Some are smarter then others, some are taller, ect., but for the most part they aren't treated differently. The problem with that is animals aren't created equally, but are regarded as inferior beings. In general people try to ignore the fact that what they're eating had to suffer to become that steak or piece of ham. Or they question the animal's ability to suffer. The basic conclusion is that most animals suffer somewhat to give us the food we eat, but there is a difference between the lifelong suffering on a feedlot, or the momentary suffering on Polyface. Either way many people are becoming vegetarian, and I am one of them (at least temporarily).
"Gems"- "The industrial animal factory offers a nightmarish glimpse of what capitalism is capable of in the absence of any moral or regulatory constraint whatsoever." Page 318
Thoughts-
-I never really seriously considered vegetarianism, as I enjoy the taste of animals. Not only that, I am one of those people that try to ignore the way that the animal I am eating got there. Though I did agree with a lot of the ideas of this chapter, I don't think it changes anything. Maybe I need to see these animals suffering.
-If the majority of thee world was vegetarian, how different would the world be now?
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 18-
Summary:
Hunting is the oldest form of getting food, and even though I don't feel totally comfortable with it, I still need to do it for my meal. So my friend Angelo, and his two friends, and myself went wild pig hunting. As I actually began the process of hunting, my feelings changed. I began to feel connected to nature. I began almost to feel high. It was almost as the effects that hunting was having on me duplicated that of smoking marijuana. On my hunting trip I had one good chance to kill a pig, and I wasn't prepared. I didn't kill any pigs that day, I didn't even get a shot off. I was left with embarrassment. But the second time that I went hunting, I killed a rather large pig. I felt accomplished, and horrible at the same time. Especially when we had to open the pig up to "dress" it. This experience made me realize how people can be against hunting, but can still eat meat they buy from stores.
"Gems"- "My emotions were as surging and confused as the knot of panicked pigs had been on this spot just a moment before." Page 343
"So much of the human project is concerned with distinguishing ourselves from beasts that we seem strenuously to avoid things that remind us that we are beasts too." Page 357
Thoughts-
-I've had the oppertunity to go hunting in the past. But I haven't. I don't know if I feel right killing animals. I think if I were to think about something else, it would just seem like shooting a target, which I have no problem doing. I find that fun. So I know the remorse he felt for the animal. I think I may try hunting, but only if I'm going to eat the game.
-What type of society would we live in, if our main way to obtain food was by hunter-gathering?
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 19-
Summary:
There is another essential form of hunting. Mushroom hunting. It's actually foraging for mushrooms, but they're really hard to locate, making it more like hunting then foraging. There are many types of fungi, ranging from edible, to deadly. Not to mention the ones that cause hallucinations. There is very little knowledge about fungi, nobody really knows how they grow, why they grow where they grow, what makes them poisonous, and what chemicals in them lead to hallucinations. They are nature's mystery. After learning about these fungi from books I realized the only way to really learn the different mushrooms, and hunting techniques, is by hunting with somebody that already knows. So I went hunting with my friend Angelo, and later with a man named Anthony. Both trips were successful, and I had then collected a good amount of mushrooms for my meal.
"Gems"-
"Morel hunting didn't sound like much fun, more like survival training than a walk in the woods. I crossed my finger that Anthony was just trying to scare me and set my alarm from 4:30AM, wondering why it is all these hunting-gathering expeditions had to big at such ungodly hours." Page 379
Thoughts-
-I really didn't think that mushroom hunting would be that hard, considering at my summer house there's alway mushrooms in the woods. It makes me wonder if these mushrooms are edible, though I would never even give a thought to eating them without a trained eye helping me. Anyways, it made me realize how hard finding good food in the wild actually is. You could spend a whole day and come back empty handed!
-What would the chances be if you just picked up a mushroom, it would be edible?
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 20-
Summary:
After visiting all those farms, after learning so much about our food systems, after learning how to hunt, it was time to prepare my perfect meal. There were a couple of rules (which I ended up breaking) to my meal. It all had to be in season, not paid for, and prepared by me. My guests for my special meal were, Angelo, Anthony, Sue, Richard, and of course, Judith, and Isaac. For my meal I had prepared a leg and loin of the pig I had hunted, as well as a paté Angelo had prepared from the liver (where the rule was broken) , fava beans served over homemade sourdough bread, some of Angelo's wine, a salad, egg fettucini with the morel mushrooms, and cherry tarts for dessert. Though the taste wasn't perfect, the meal was to me because it was all natural. I collected everything for the meal myself, and it was my meal, and it was perfect.
"Gems"-
"This meal was far richer in stories then calories." Page 393
"For would need any reminding that however we choose to feed ourselves, we eat by the grace of nature, not industry, and what we're eating is never more or less then the body of the world." Page 411
"It was just still a menu, okay, and it admittedly broke several of my own rules, and leaned rather heavily on Angelo's generosity talents." Page 398
Thoughts:
-I think that this chapter was a good conclusion to the book, as it displays the way that we were meant to eat food. ALL NATURALLY. Industrialization of our food may have brought modernization, but it also brought a lot more problems then we can handle. When we obtain, process, and cook our own food, we know how it go to us, it's a better way to eat and live. Industrial standards have brought our own standards of eating down so much, so I understand why this meal was so important to Michael Pollan. I know I don't have the time, resources, or knowledge to make a meal like his, but one day I will. I think that fishing would be a good alternative to hunting, considering I don't want to spend the time or money to get a hunting license I'm going to use once. In conclusion, I enjoyed this book, it was very educating, and it opened up my eyes to the food world.
Summary-
People are starting to change to a vegetarian lifestyle now more then ever. Even though we have been eating animals for tens of thousands of years, people are all of a sudden concerned with how ethical killing animals is. Philosophers like Peter Singer bring up the point, all people aren't actually created equal. Some are smarter then others, some are taller, ect., but for the most part they aren't treated differently. The problem with that is animals aren't created equally, but are regarded as inferior beings. In general people try to ignore the fact that what they're eating had to suffer to become that steak or piece of ham. Or they question the animal's ability to suffer. The basic conclusion is that most animals suffer somewhat to give us the food we eat, but there is a difference between the lifelong suffering on a feedlot, or the momentary suffering on Polyface. Either way many people are becoming vegetarian, and I am one of them (at least temporarily).
"Gems"- "The industrial animal factory offers a nightmarish glimpse of what capitalism is capable of in the absence of any moral or regulatory constraint whatsoever." Page 318
Thoughts-
-I never really seriously considered vegetarianism, as I enjoy the taste of animals. Not only that, I am one of those people that try to ignore the way that the animal I am eating got there. Though I did agree with a lot of the ideas of this chapter, I don't think it changes anything. Maybe I need to see these animals suffering.
-If the majority of thee world was vegetarian, how different would the world be now?
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 18-
Summary:
Hunting is the oldest form of getting food, and even though I don't feel totally comfortable with it, I still need to do it for my meal. So my friend Angelo, and his two friends, and myself went wild pig hunting. As I actually began the process of hunting, my feelings changed. I began to feel connected to nature. I began almost to feel high. It was almost as the effects that hunting was having on me duplicated that of smoking marijuana. On my hunting trip I had one good chance to kill a pig, and I wasn't prepared. I didn't kill any pigs that day, I didn't even get a shot off. I was left with embarrassment. But the second time that I went hunting, I killed a rather large pig. I felt accomplished, and horrible at the same time. Especially when we had to open the pig up to "dress" it. This experience made me realize how people can be against hunting, but can still eat meat they buy from stores.
"Gems"- "My emotions were as surging and confused as the knot of panicked pigs had been on this spot just a moment before." Page 343
"So much of the human project is concerned with distinguishing ourselves from beasts that we seem strenuously to avoid things that remind us that we are beasts too." Page 357
Thoughts-
-I've had the oppertunity to go hunting in the past. But I haven't. I don't know if I feel right killing animals. I think if I were to think about something else, it would just seem like shooting a target, which I have no problem doing. I find that fun. So I know the remorse he felt for the animal. I think I may try hunting, but only if I'm going to eat the game.
-What type of society would we live in, if our main way to obtain food was by hunter-gathering?
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 19-
Summary:
There is another essential form of hunting. Mushroom hunting. It's actually foraging for mushrooms, but they're really hard to locate, making it more like hunting then foraging. There are many types of fungi, ranging from edible, to deadly. Not to mention the ones that cause hallucinations. There is very little knowledge about fungi, nobody really knows how they grow, why they grow where they grow, what makes them poisonous, and what chemicals in them lead to hallucinations. They are nature's mystery. After learning about these fungi from books I realized the only way to really learn the different mushrooms, and hunting techniques, is by hunting with somebody that already knows. So I went hunting with my friend Angelo, and later with a man named Anthony. Both trips were successful, and I had then collected a good amount of mushrooms for my meal.
"Gems"-
"Morel hunting didn't sound like much fun, more like survival training than a walk in the woods. I crossed my finger that Anthony was just trying to scare me and set my alarm from 4:30AM, wondering why it is all these hunting-gathering expeditions had to big at such ungodly hours." Page 379
Thoughts-
-I really didn't think that mushroom hunting would be that hard, considering at my summer house there's alway mushrooms in the woods. It makes me wonder if these mushrooms are edible, though I would never even give a thought to eating them without a trained eye helping me. Anyways, it made me realize how hard finding good food in the wild actually is. You could spend a whole day and come back empty handed!
-What would the chances be if you just picked up a mushroom, it would be edible?
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 20-
Summary:
After visiting all those farms, after learning so much about our food systems, after learning how to hunt, it was time to prepare my perfect meal. There were a couple of rules (which I ended up breaking) to my meal. It all had to be in season, not paid for, and prepared by me. My guests for my special meal were, Angelo, Anthony, Sue, Richard, and of course, Judith, and Isaac. For my meal I had prepared a leg and loin of the pig I had hunted, as well as a paté Angelo had prepared from the liver (where the rule was broken) , fava beans served over homemade sourdough bread, some of Angelo's wine, a salad, egg fettucini with the morel mushrooms, and cherry tarts for dessert. Though the taste wasn't perfect, the meal was to me because it was all natural. I collected everything for the meal myself, and it was my meal, and it was perfect.
"Gems"-
"This meal was far richer in stories then calories." Page 393
"For would need any reminding that however we choose to feed ourselves, we eat by the grace of nature, not industry, and what we're eating is never more or less then the body of the world." Page 411
"It was just still a menu, okay, and it admittedly broke several of my own rules, and leaned rather heavily on Angelo's generosity talents." Page 398
Thoughts:
-I think that this chapter was a good conclusion to the book, as it displays the way that we were meant to eat food. ALL NATURALLY. Industrialization of our food may have brought modernization, but it also brought a lot more problems then we can handle. When we obtain, process, and cook our own food, we know how it go to us, it's a better way to eat and live. Industrial standards have brought our own standards of eating down so much, so I understand why this meal was so important to Michael Pollan. I know I don't have the time, resources, or knowledge to make a meal like his, but one day I will. I think that fishing would be a good alternative to hunting, considering I don't want to spend the time or money to get a hunting license I'm going to use once. In conclusion, I enjoyed this book, it was very educating, and it opened up my eyes to the food world.
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Homework 9- Freakonomics Response
Correlation and Causation
In the Documentary, Freakonomics, Steven Levitt and Stephan Dubner address the fallacy that "correlation is causation". They believe that when two things go together, one causes the other. Like the fallacy that most black people cant swim because their black. Thats not the reason that they can't swim. The statistics would show that its because less blacks are around swimming areas often, or that they weren't given swim lessons as a child.
This documentary acknowledged that correlation is not causation. There was an example in the movie about how there's a common idea that if you have a "black name", you won't be successful, or you will automatically act "ghetto". But Levitt and Dunbar argue that the name isn't what causes the low rate of success and quality of life, it's the environment that goes with the name. Statistics in the movie proved that the someone named Shaniqua is more likely born to a single mother, who has a low income, and little education. These factors lead to Shaniqua having poor quality of life, not the fact that her name is Shaniqua. This example helps Levitt and Dunbar prove correlation is not causation.
Evidence
In the documentary most of the evidence that Steven Levitt and Stephan Dubner used were accumulated statistics. Which is what most people use for evidence. But there were some ways of finding the evidence and statistics that were innovative. One of the ways was they looked at tests to see if teachers were filling in correct answers to help students (which actually isn't helping students at all). The way they did this was by comparing the answers from the beginning of the tests to the answers from the end, (the ones that would be left blank), and found that the answers from the end had a much higher rate of being right. Which was a very innovative way to collect and the use statistics. They did an effective job of using their evidence to prove their points.
Freakonomics serves as an inspiration and good example to our attempt to explore the "hidden-in-plain-sight" weirdness of dominant social practices.
I agree with this statement completely. The movie took things that seemed so simple and made it to be more. Like, with the names, who really thinks about what a name could do to decide the future of a person. Or how we think about grades being important, when some people are getting paid for certain grades. All these things are right in front of us all the time, but we don't think about them that they are. One idea from the book "Omnivore's Dilemma" that relates back to this movie was the idea of labels. The food we eat comes with all these labels, "organic", "Free-range", "Cageless". These label's affect what food is bought and what's considered "good food". People are labeled, like different things go into what makes an acceptable, or a "Ghetto" name.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Homework 7c- Omnivore's Dilemma
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 11-
Summary:
Joe Salatin's farm basically runs itself. He does as little as possible to interfere with the natural aspects of his farm. He only gives hid farm what it can take. Not too many animals on the farm so there's no destruction, not too many vehicles so there's no pollution. He also keeps forest life around the farm to keep animals shaded and cool in the summer, absorb water, and to keep predators out. He uses all natural defenses for his animals and farm. All of this protection leads to a lot of food being produced every year.
"Gems"-
"I asked Joel how much food Polyface produces in a season, and he rattled off these figures:
30,000 eggs
12,00 broilers
800 stewing hens
50 beeves (representing 25,00 pounds of beef)
250 hogs (50,00 pounds of pork)
800 turkeys
500 rabbits." Page 222
"The woods represented a whole order of complexity I didn't take into account. I realized that Joel didn't look at this land the same way I did" Page 224
Thoughts:
Anybody that thinks that this method of farming isn't efficient like standard farming is clearly wrong. This 100 acre farm produces a lot of food each year. Exceptional numbers for a farm of that size. When people in the corn industry want to talk about efficiency being priority, look at this farm. Enough said.
How will our depletion of forests and woods affect our farming techniques?
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 12-
Summary:
Alternative farmer, Joel Salatin shares a problem with any other farmer, alternative or not. He has to slaughter his animals. He isn't allowed to slaughter cows or pigs on his farm due to USDA regulations, but he can slaughter chickens. So he takes advantage, slaughtering all his chickens on his farm. Joel believes that this way he is expanding his world view, and preserving the natural cycle that he has built. By killing his own chickens, Joel is making sure that the chickens weren't processed, and that the guts aren't turned into "protein feed" for farm animals. While Joel enjoys this process of slaughtering, I did not. But I understand how it is better to slaughter in the way that Joel does. He wishes that the strict regulations for slaughtering and processing were lifted so he could slaughter all of his animals himself.
"Gems"-
"Joel is convinced that "clean food" could compete with supermarket food if the government would exempt farmers from the thickest of regulations that prohibit the processing and selling of meat from the farm." Page 236
"'We do not allow the government to dictate what religion you can observe, so why should we allow them to dictate what food we buy?" Page 236
Thoughts:
- I found the slaughtering process to be pretty cool. I would like to see it myself, or even try to slaughter a chicken. I definitely find Joel Salatin's set-up and process to be better then a large-scale slaughtering house. It seems cleaner, and it's ultimately better for the farm.
-I agree with Joel's Salatin's views on the USDA regulations, they're aimed at the big farms and feedlots. There is nothing wrong with his methods, and the food can end up safer and cleaner.
-What changes would we see in the market if farmers could slaughter and process animals from their farms?
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 13-
Summary:
All of the food that Polyface farm produces isn't shipped across the country like from an industrial farm. It is sold only to local consumers. Due to regulations on food processing, and the low industrial prices, the food from Polyface costs about a dollar more a pound compared to industrial food products. But if you look at the quality, there isn't any medicine, pollution, or food-borne illness in Joel's food. That's where the extra dollar comes from. In the long run, buying from Joel's farm could save complications, in some cases money, and it's better to know where the food is coming from.
"Gems"- "'Why do you have to have a New York City? What good is it?' If there was a dark side to Joel's vision of the postindustrial food chain, I realized, it was the deep antipathy to cities that has so often shadowed rural populism in this country.'" Page 245
Thoughts:
-I like the fact Joel isn't shipping products across the country. It really fits into his ideals. He is also recognized as a real person, unlike someone like George Naylor, who can't even be linked back to his food. It's a good way to distribute food, by keeping it local.
-I don't think that the food from Polyface should cost more then the food that was industrial grown, it should cost less if anything. Joel's system makes so much more sense, as it protects the earth, and keeps everything natural.
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 14-
Summary:
At the end of my week on Polyface, I cooked a dinner for my friends, Joel and his family. I used food only from the farm. For the meal I slow roasted two chickens, cooked corn, made a salad, and used the farms eggs to create a soufflé. The meal was very good, and was at a higher nutritional value, as it lacked the corn-fed animals, pesticides, antibiotic treatments, not to mention the added omega-3 and vitamin E that the chickens gained from eating the grass.
"Gems"- "When chickens get to live like chickens, they'll taste like chickens, too." Page 270
"As long as one egg looks pretty much like another, all the chickens look like chickens, and beef beef, the substitution of quantity for quality will go unnoticed by most consumers." Page 269
Thoughts-
-This seemed like a nice little meal. It made me appreciate what a home-cooked meal means. For them, their food comes from their home. Like Michael Pollan, I might have been hesitant to want to cook and eat the animals from the farm, considering how connected he was to them, how he saw the process in which they had died. But then you think, "a mans gotta eat."
- I enjoyed how in-depth he went about the preparation of the food. It makes me want to duplicate his meal.
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 15-
Summary:
After exploring two very different food chains, I am going to go a different route, and make my own meal out of all foraged foods, relying only on the wild for food. Though, with a task simple enough, I'm not prepared for it yet. Growing up on the agricultural food chain, and without exposure to the wild, this leaves me uncomfortable. But with the help of a hunter education course, I will achieve my goal. I believe this process will give me a new outlook on life.
"Gems"- "Otherwise it's hard to explain why humans would have ever traded such a healthy and comparativly pleasant way of life for backbreaking, monotonous work of agrculture." Page 279
"Anthropologists estimate that typical hunter-gatherers worked at feeding themselves no more then seventeen hours a week, and were far more robust and long-lived then agriculturists."
Thoughts-
-Even though I have spent every summer of my life in the woods, around wild plants, and around wild animals, I could not imagine trying to gather those plants and hunt those animals for food. That may be because I spend the other ten or so months in New York City, but I feel almost the same way as Michael does.
- If we never switched over to agriculture, how different would our society be today?
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 16-
Summary:
Humans come equipped with a brain much larger then their stomach, and that allows us to recognize a varied selection of tastes and foods. Because of this we get that very familiar and repetitive question, "What should I eat?" We are influenced by our culture, the cost, the health benefits, and most importantly the taste. Americans wonder how other cultures stay healthy, as Americans may be some of the most unhealthy eaters. It all comes down to how people handle the omnivore's dilemma.
"Gems"- "There is a short and direct path from the omnivore's dilemma to the astounding number of ethical rules from which people have sought to regulate eating for as long as they have been living in groups" Page 298
"Being an omnivore occupying a niche in nature is both a boon and a challenge, a source of tremendous power as well as anxiety." Page 295
Thoughts-
-You never really think about how much variety we have to eat, and how much that effects the way we eat. But as we are allowed to go out to eat in our school, by second period you start thinking about how much money you have for lunch, and where your going to eat. But to be healthy we should be thinking less about the cost and more about nutrition.
-Would life be easier if we didn't have so much food to choose from?
Summary:
Alternative farmer, Joel Salatin shares a problem with any other farmer, alternative or not. He has to slaughter his animals. He isn't allowed to slaughter cows or pigs on his farm due to USDA regulations, but he can slaughter chickens. So he takes advantage, slaughtering all his chickens on his farm. Joel believes that this way he is expanding his world view, and preserving the natural cycle that he has built. By killing his own chickens, Joel is making sure that the chickens weren't processed, and that the guts aren't turned into "protein feed" for farm animals. While Joel enjoys this process of slaughtering, I did not. But I understand how it is better to slaughter in the way that Joel does. He wishes that the strict regulations for slaughtering and processing were lifted so he could slaughter all of his animals himself.
"Gems"-
"Joel is convinced that "clean food" could compete with supermarket food if the government would exempt farmers from the thickest of regulations that prohibit the processing and selling of meat from the farm." Page 236
"'We do not allow the government to dictate what religion you can observe, so why should we allow them to dictate what food we buy?" Page 236
Thoughts:
- I found the slaughtering process to be pretty cool. I would like to see it myself, or even try to slaughter a chicken. I definitely find Joel Salatin's set-up and process to be better then a large-scale slaughtering house. It seems cleaner, and it's ultimately better for the farm.
-I agree with Joel's Salatin's views on the USDA regulations, they're aimed at the big farms and feedlots. There is nothing wrong with his methods, and the food can end up safer and cleaner.
-What changes would we see in the market if farmers could slaughter and process animals from their farms?
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 13-
Summary:
All of the food that Polyface farm produces isn't shipped across the country like from an industrial farm. It is sold only to local consumers. Due to regulations on food processing, and the low industrial prices, the food from Polyface costs about a dollar more a pound compared to industrial food products. But if you look at the quality, there isn't any medicine, pollution, or food-borne illness in Joel's food. That's where the extra dollar comes from. In the long run, buying from Joel's farm could save complications, in some cases money, and it's better to know where the food is coming from.
"Gems"- "'Why do you have to have a New York City? What good is it?' If there was a dark side to Joel's vision of the postindustrial food chain, I realized, it was the deep antipathy to cities that has so often shadowed rural populism in this country.'" Page 245
Thoughts:
-I like the fact Joel isn't shipping products across the country. It really fits into his ideals. He is also recognized as a real person, unlike someone like George Naylor, who can't even be linked back to his food. It's a good way to distribute food, by keeping it local.
-I don't think that the food from Polyface should cost more then the food that was industrial grown, it should cost less if anything. Joel's system makes so much more sense, as it protects the earth, and keeps everything natural.
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 14-
Summary:
At the end of my week on Polyface, I cooked a dinner for my friends, Joel and his family. I used food only from the farm. For the meal I slow roasted two chickens, cooked corn, made a salad, and used the farms eggs to create a soufflé. The meal was very good, and was at a higher nutritional value, as it lacked the corn-fed animals, pesticides, antibiotic treatments, not to mention the added omega-3 and vitamin E that the chickens gained from eating the grass.
"Gems"- "When chickens get to live like chickens, they'll taste like chickens, too." Page 270
"As long as one egg looks pretty much like another, all the chickens look like chickens, and beef beef, the substitution of quantity for quality will go unnoticed by most consumers." Page 269
Thoughts-
-This seemed like a nice little meal. It made me appreciate what a home-cooked meal means. For them, their food comes from their home. Like Michael Pollan, I might have been hesitant to want to cook and eat the animals from the farm, considering how connected he was to them, how he saw the process in which they had died. But then you think, "a mans gotta eat."
- I enjoyed how in-depth he went about the preparation of the food. It makes me want to duplicate his meal.
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 15-
Summary:
After exploring two very different food chains, I am going to go a different route, and make my own meal out of all foraged foods, relying only on the wild for food. Though, with a task simple enough, I'm not prepared for it yet. Growing up on the agricultural food chain, and without exposure to the wild, this leaves me uncomfortable. But with the help of a hunter education course, I will achieve my goal. I believe this process will give me a new outlook on life.
"Gems"- "Otherwise it's hard to explain why humans would have ever traded such a healthy and comparativly pleasant way of life for backbreaking, monotonous work of agrculture." Page 279
"Anthropologists estimate that typical hunter-gatherers worked at feeding themselves no more then seventeen hours a week, and were far more robust and long-lived then agriculturists."
Thoughts-
-Even though I have spent every summer of my life in the woods, around wild plants, and around wild animals, I could not imagine trying to gather those plants and hunt those animals for food. That may be because I spend the other ten or so months in New York City, but I feel almost the same way as Michael does.
- If we never switched over to agriculture, how different would our society be today?
Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Chapter 16-
Summary:
Humans come equipped with a brain much larger then their stomach, and that allows us to recognize a varied selection of tastes and foods. Because of this we get that very familiar and repetitive question, "What should I eat?" We are influenced by our culture, the cost, the health benefits, and most importantly the taste. Americans wonder how other cultures stay healthy, as Americans may be some of the most unhealthy eaters. It all comes down to how people handle the omnivore's dilemma.
"Gems"- "There is a short and direct path from the omnivore's dilemma to the astounding number of ethical rules from which people have sought to regulate eating for as long as they have been living in groups" Page 298
"Being an omnivore occupying a niche in nature is both a boon and a challenge, a source of tremendous power as well as anxiety." Page 295
Thoughts-
-You never really think about how much variety we have to eat, and how much that effects the way we eat. But as we are allowed to go out to eat in our school, by second period you start thinking about how much money you have for lunch, and where your going to eat. But to be healthy we should be thinking less about the cost and more about nutrition.
-Would life be easier if we didn't have so much food to choose from?
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Homework 8- Eating My Sprouts
The experience of growing my own food wasn't that special, because my family has a garden and we eat blueberries and stuff that we grow. I was actually surprised in how little care and time it took to grow the sprouts. The process was fairly easy, as watering seeds in a jar twice a day takes two minutes or less. But as my sprouts grew fine, I know there was some peoples that didn't. So while my process was fast and simple, it could have been long, tedious, and frustrating. The one thing that I did like about growing my own food was that I knew where my food was coming from. That usually doesn't happen, as the food in supermarkets is from around the country, and around the world. It made me realize that like 99% if the time I don't know where my food originated from.
I ate most of my sprouts on stuffed peppers. The rest I ate straight out of my jar. The taste to me was very grassy, except there was a few hints of spice throughout.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)